|
The global financial turmoil
will cause one hundred million people to fall below the poverty line,
Greg
Dorey, Britain's ambassador to Hungary, said in a lecture on Wednesday.
Read the ambassador's entire speech about the Millenium Development
Goals (MDGs).
"There is no excuse for idleness".
That’s my title today. By the time I stop talking about the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs), I hope you will agree with me.
The British
Embassy opened a photographic exhibition last week called "Eight". Do see it if you can, –
either at the Embassy or when it transfers to the Budapest International
Business School next week. The photographs, aside from being works of art, are
records of individuals whose lives would be transformed by fulfilment of the
MDGs. The photographer, Nick Danziger, came to Budapest last week to give a
talk at the opening of the Exhibition about the stories behind the photographs.
Nick has
photographed people around the world living in appalling conditions, girls
selling their bodies to go to school, children orphaned by HIV–AIDS, children
living on the streets. The message his work gives us is that the MDGs are about
ordinary people – people like us who just happen to have been born somewhere else
– and their lives and hopes.
I was
particularly struck by one photograph of a boy in Niger called Abbas. Aged 15,
he has already been working down a gold mine for 3 years – from 6am to 7pm, 363
days a year – he gets two days off. Although his family lives only 12km away,
Abbas has only seen his father only once since he started work. He works in
dark, cramped conditions with no safety measures. Abbas was sent to the mine to
earn money for his family but has never earned enough to send anything home. He
mines for gold, but does not know what it looks like. Last year his boss was
killed because he fell down the 22m hole leading to the mineshaft. Abbas has no
prospect of change – no future in front of him apart from this monotonous and
dangerous existence.
The other
messages that I hope you will take away with you today are that the MDGs affect
Hungary and that every individual can do something to help. We recently sent
some journalists from HVG and Népszabadság to Tanzania, in part because it`s too easy for all of us
in Europe just to focus on the problems, and we wanted them to see projects
that are having a visible and positive effect too. They met a Hungarian woman
there working for Tanzanian Educational Network
as a Policy Officer through an organization called Voluntary Service Overseas. The articles they wrote as a result are on the British Embassy
website, for those of you that are interested. I also recently read an
interesting article in Népszabadság, about another Hungarian woman working on
development in Uganda. It’s very encouraging to hear about young people like
this volunteering to work in the developing world and to hear about Hungarian
NGOs` projects there.
Let me start on
the mechanics – what the MDGs are and progress towards reaching them, say a
little about UK development policy and the "Call to Action", and end on world trade and the impact of the
financial crisis. I am happy to take questions after Professor Simai has
spoken.
So let me start
with the MDGs themselves. What are they? Some of you will know already, but
please bear with me.
The eight MDGs
were adopted by 189 nations in September 2000. They represent a shared world
vision to reduce world poverty. The overarching goal is to reduce by half the
proportion of people living on less than a dollar a day by 2015.
Most of the MDG
targets were not new. They were first set out in international conferences and
summits held in the 1990s and brought together as the International Development
Goals. So they have been around for some time. In September 2000 UN member
states adopted the Millennium Declaration and the goals were accepted as part
of a road map for making this reality and rechristened the MDGs.
All leading
relevant international organisations – over 20 of them – are committed to
implementing the MDGs.
The Eight goals
are:
i. Eradicate extreme poverty and
hunger
ii. Achieve universal primary
education
iii. Promote gender equality and
empower women
iv. Reduce child mortality
v. Improve maternal health
vi. Combat HIV and AIDS, malaria
and other major diseases
vii. Ensure environmental
sustainability
viii. Develop a global partnership
for development
Each of the
goals – all of which deal with basic human rights to shelter life, health,
food, etc. – is underpinned by specific targets and measurable indicators.
Tracking the MDGs, progress
towards reaching them, what needs to be done.
Since 2000, real
progress in implementing the MDGs has been seen: for example there are now 41
million more children in school, 3 million more children are surviving
childhood each year, and 2 million more people are receiving treatment for
AIDS. But detailed analysis of the targets and indicators shows that there is
much more to be done.
For those of you
that are interested in looking at this in further detail, there are several
websites that track progress towards the MDGs. I would refer you in particular
to relevant work by the World Bank, UNDP, the European Commission and the UK
Department for International Development (DFID). Links to all of these can be
found via the British Embassy website.
UN assessments
show the MDG targets as either "on
target", "on track"
or "lagging". The only
target to merit an assessment of "on
target" is "to halve
between 1990 and 2015 the proportion of people whose income is less than one
dollar a day" (and sub–Saharan Africa is not expected to meet even
this target). Two others "To
reduce the under–5 mortality rate by 2/3 between 1990 and 2015", and
"by 2015 to halve the proportion
of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water" are
both assessed as "on track".
All other targets – a lot – are "lagging".
Rates of
progress are not evenly spread geographically. Sub–Saharan Africa has failed to
make sufficient progress towards any of the MDGs. Progress towards the
MDGs in Asia has been more mixed, with successes in reducing poverty, but
remaining challenges in reducing maternal mortality, combating HIV/AIDS and
ensuring environmental sustainability.
In Latin
America, the Caribbean and Central Asia, progress towards reducing poverty by
half has been slow and the picture is mixed on other targets. For example in
Latin America, HIV rates have remained stable, but are growing in Ukraine,
Russia, Central Asia and parts of the Caribbean.
UK development policyLet me turn to British
development policy. In 1997 the UK government set up a Ministry to deal with
development policy – the Department for International Development. (Before 1997
development policy was carried out by an agency under the Foreign Ministry).
The Ministry now employs 2,500 people, half of whom work overseas. Douglas
Alexander is the Secretary of State – the main Minister – for International
Development and a member of the Cabinet. It means development policy is not
determined by the foreign policy, though the two are – hopefully – consistent.
DFID's overall
aim is to reduce poverty. Everything they do is guided by the MDGs. DFID works
through country programmes but around two–fifths of its money is spent through
international institutions such as the UN.
Douglas
Alexander has set out DFID's main priorities for achieving the MDGs as being
encouraging growth; ensuring peace and security; combatting climate change; and
bringing about change in the international system.
Between
Financial Years 2007/08 and 21010/11 DFID's aid programme will increase by an
average of 11% in real terms. This will mean that the UK is on track to spend
0.7% of Gross National income (GNI) by 2013 (2 years ahead of the EU's target).
I want to break
off at this point to give you a few concrete examples of DFID's work. I
think it’s important in the midst of all these facts and figures to keep things
real and remember that we are talking about actual people.
Sometimes a
relatively small change can make a huge difference. In primary schools in the
northern Indian State of Uttar Pradesh, serving a hot cooked midday meal has
transformed attendance. As part of a major government initiative, supported by
DFID, the meal not only gives students an incentive to stay at school but for
many it will be the only meal they get all day. It has made a significant
difference in drawing in girls. As one teacher put it, since there is no
additional expenditure on food and their daughters are assured of at least one
meal per day, parents are willing to send them to school. As one parent put it
"their health has improved and so
has their motivation. At least now they will not remain illiterate like me."
HIV–AIDS has
robbed many children of their future. In Zimbabwe 13 year old Life Mbedzi, had
to drop out of school at 9 when his parents died from AIDS–related illnesses.
He has no money for lunch, but at least a DFID programme has enabled him to
return to school.
In southern
India, the DFID–supported "Education
for All" programme has ensured that hundreds of poorly paid child
workers have been able to return to school. Rajesh was orphaned at the age of
10. His uncle took him in but he had to leave school and find a job to earn his
keep. "Education for All"
has provided him with food, clothes and a bed to sleep in. Rajesh is now on a
par, academically, with children his own age and has the prospect of educating
himself out of the poverty trap.
Ethiopia has
been hit hard this year by a combination of failed rains and rising food
prices. In the worst–hit parts of the country people are starving. This summer
Nick Danziger, the photographer I mentioned earlier, was commissioned by the
British NGO Oxfam to take a series of photographs of them. The results are
harrowing, very difficult to look at. But some Ethiopians have been luckier. A
DFID–funded programme has provided food and money to some of those at risk in
exchange for work in improving public facilities. So communities benefit from
better roads and water points, while individuals are able to secure themselves against
famine. An example is Aster Kurma, who lives with her husband and 8 children
350km south of the capital Addis Ababa. She works hard on soil conservation and
tree planting projects, with the aim of turning parched land into lush green
plots. Payment comes in food or money. Aster prefers to be paid in food because
its value is more reliable. She says her family now have 2 meals a day.
Call to Action
Back the MDGs –
as I indicated, some progress but overall "lagging". In his first speech to the UN in July 2007, UK Prime
Minister Gordon Brown, speaking alongside the UN Secretary–General, Ban Ki–Moon
launched an international campaign – the Call to Action – to accelerate
progress on the MDGs. He called on world leaders, the private sector and civil
society to join this effort. (Hungary signed up to the "Call to Action" in summer 2008.)
Ban Ki–Moon has
called 2008 a "critical year for
progress..… Let 2008” – he said, “be
the year of the bottom billion”.
On 6 May the
Business Call to Action (BCA) was launched with an event in London, bringing
together business leaders to showcase initiatives to support growth in poor
countries. The aim of the BCA is not philanthropy, simply encouraging
businessmen to give money, but to encourage the private sector to implement
concrete initiatives that apply their core business skills and expertise to
enhance growth and wealth creation to help meet the MDGs.
The private
sector has the technology, skills and expertise for wealth and job creation
that, if properly mobilised, will help meet the MDGs. It is in their best
business interest to help poor countries develop to create businesses and jobs
in the new economies and ensure stability and growth.
September 25 saw
the UN Secretary General's High Level Event in New York, which brought together
a wide coalition of governments, civil society, businessmen, faith leaders,
city leaders, NGOs and celebrities to discuss ways of taking forward work in
various sectors. The event generated new commitments totalling $16 billion. Again,
you can access the details via our website. Bob Geldof said, “it was a moment of great civilisation when
the Millennium Goals were set. To fail would be a great failure of our
civilisation. The steps made this week may seem unspectacular, but they did inject
much needed new urgency into this bold project. Somebody’s life just got
better.”
The next major
international meeting will be the Doha Financing for Development conference,
starting on 29 November, where donors and developing countries will discuss next
steps. There are also mechanisms in place to take forward work on particular
sectors e.g. the Fast Track initiative on Education; health plans; and various
food security meetings are planned for later this year.
The UK believes
strongly that we must not let the momentum generated by these events drop off.
We want to see continued improvement of international tracking of and analysis
of the MDGs and ensure that the commitments made at the UN High Level Event are
delivered. With this in mind the UK also supports the Secretary–General's
proposal for a 2010 MDG Review Summit.
WTO talks
What about the
link with trade? In contrast to the momentum of development generated by the
High Level Event, the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Doha Development Agenda
failed to make any significant progress this year.
Trade is an
integral part of development policy. There are clear linkages between trade,
development and poverty reduction. Evidence shows clearly that trade
liberalisation and openness has a beneficial impact on economic growth. So no
surprise that countries which have seized the opportunity offered by more open
world markets to increase exports and attract inward investment have made the
greatest strides in reducing poverty.
The share of the
poorest countries in global trade has declined from 0.8% in 1980 to 0.4% today.
So to make real progress in reducing extreme poverty, those poorest countries
need to be drawn into the global economy and increase their access to modern
knowledge and technology.
The UK remains
strongly committed to the multilateral trade system and to preserving the
strength and openness of world trade. A successful conclusion to the Doha
Development Agenda remains our main current trade policy priority.
The impact of the financial
crisis
The other recent
major issue inevitably affecting development issues has been the financial
crisis. This has left almost no country unaffected but the poorest countries
will be hardest hit. We estimate that 100m more people were pushed into poverty
this year and 850m cannot afford enough to eat as a result of the high oil and
food prices. Falls in oil prices will take a long time to filter through to
these people. And reductions in global access to credit are likely to have a
direct effect on local industries and firms. Evidence suggests that while
African Banks are not vulnerable to contagion from Wall Street, they are
vulnerable to local economic downturn.
Economic
downturn in Europe and the USA will reduce demand for imported goods and
services, and for foreign direct investment. Tourism is also likely to suffer.
And decreased remittance flows from workers in developed countries to families
at home (and the return of some migrants if jobs are not available at all) will
only make things worse. The Mexican Central Bank for example reported a 12%
yearly fall in remittances in August.
As a result of
all this, the IMF has identified 22 highly vulnerable countries, 8 of which
also face debt sustainability issues.
In times of
crisis it is tempting for countries to become inward looking, focusing on
domestic priorities and problems. However the urgency to act to achieve
stability and prosperity for all has only increased.
Following the
recession of the early 1990s many donor governments let aid efforts decline,
which impacted very negatively on developing countries in areas such as
agricultural production, infrastructure, social welfare and political
stability. We must not make this mistake again.
When the
domestic revenues of developing countries are decreasing; there are limited
options for increasing taxation; and food and energy prices are biting hard,
there is a risk that countries will try to borrow to meet their needs or to
sell off national assets. This risk is compounded if we cut the amount of aid
we have promised.
There is a clear
moral case for helping those most badly affected by the financial crisis. But
ensuring stability is also in our own interests. We know that poor countries
face heightened possibilities of conflict and insecurity in times of economic
and social stress. The cost to the international community of failing to
respond to conflict or rebuilding failed states is far greater than trying to
ensure economic stability by maintaining current aid flows. And we need to
involve developing countries in dealing with global problems.
As PM Gordon Brown, put it at the
UN High–Level Event on the MDGs, in September:
“Some say this time of
financial turbulence is the time to put our ambitions on hold, to cut back or
postpone the dream of achieving the Millennium Development Goals, but this
would be the worst time to turn back.
Every global problem we
have requires global solutions, involving all the continents of the world. We
cannot solve the food shortages that face many continents without involving
Africa and developing countries. We cannot solve climate change without
involving Africa and developing countries. We cannot solve the pressure on
resources and energy without involving Africa and the developing countries. And
Africa and other developing countries are not the problem – they are part of
the very solution to today's problem”.
The British
Government has made clear that the UK's pre–existing aid commitments will be
honoured and we continue to encourage other donor governments to deliver on
their commitments and ensuring that the world's richest countries – of which
Hungary is one, although it may feel under pressure now – do not renege on
their promises to the world's poorest. We remain committed to accelerating
progress towards meeting the MDGs and fighting global poverty.
The Doha meeting
in November will bring together donors and developing countries and the meeting
needs to send a strong message on development financing in light of the current
climate. The UK wants to see countries reaffirm global commitments to
development and acknowledge the need to maintain aid levels; increase efforts
to improve aid effectiveness; and find appropriate ways to support developing
countries in addressing new challenges such as climate financing.
The UK also
believes that the current financial situation increases the case for looking
again at the rules for a globally integrated financial sector and for reform of
the international system as a whole. This is too big a topic for me to venture
onto today. If you are interested, there are materials on the Embassy website
setting out my government's position on this.
Why do the MDGs matter to
the EU and Hungary?
Let me end by saying something about why
the MDGs should matter to the EU and Hungary. The fact is that the impact of
poverty is not confined to geographically–distant countries. It is knocking on
our front door already.
Poverty in the
developing world leads directly to economic migration – legal and illegal –
into Europe as people seek better lives and opportunities. It undermines
democratic systems leading to failed states, conflict and radicalisation, which
in turn fuels terrorism.
Unemployment and
no prospect of securing a reliable legitimate income leads to increased
criminal activity – the flourishing international drugs trade is one symptom of
this.
Businesses
cannot operate in countries where the infrastructure is poor, the potential
workforce malnourished, there are few consumers and there is no effective rule
of law. So large parts of the world cannot develop their way out of poverty and
potential markets are limited. Hungary does not have many markets in the
developing world. But Hungary’s trade partners do. So expect an indirect
economic impact.
Greenhouse gas
emissions do not respect national boundaries, nor do international diseases.
If we are to
solve these and other global problems, and do so in a sustainable way, we need
to act to make ordinary people's lives in the developing world prosperous,
peaceful and stable.
Hungary is an EU
partner, member of the UN and member of the OECD; it supports the MDGs and has
signed up to the "Call to Action".
Hungary is a relatively developed and wealthy country. For all these reasons it
has an important role to play and commitments to uphold.
Hungary is also
the front line of the Schengen region and therefore also in the front line for
many of the problems I have mentioned above.
With its work in
its Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Baghlan Province in Afghanistan
which has involved your military contingent there in infrastructure projects,
and work on education and primary health care, the Hungarian government has
shown that it can make a good and effective contribution to development
outside of its neighbourhood.
And, as the
"Call to Action" states,
it's not just about what governments do. Hungary and Hungarians have a
fantastic contribution to make. The Hungarian Association of NGO`s for
Development and Humanitarian Aid (HAND) is an association of NGOs working on
development issues with the support of the Hungarian MFA. Members include the
Hungarian Inter–Church Association, whose work covers community–based
reconstruction programmes in Sri Lanka and Thailand; social development
programmes aimed at assisting the disabled in Uzbekistan; and the Foundation
for Africa, which deals with educational, social and medical issues. Its work
includes supporting a school and orphanage in the Congo.
Individuals may
feel powerless to influence world events. But in reality all of us can make a
personal commitment and have an effect. We cannot all work as volunteers in
Africa but we make a difference by finding out more and becoming better
informed; by supporting the work of NGOs; by buying fairly traded goods; by
doing what we can to go "Green"
and protect the environment; and by asking relevant questions and putting
pressure on our governments to honour their commitments and do more.
It’s a small
world these days and no country can live in isolation. We need to work together
so that for example a child does not die of poverty every 3 seconds somewhere
in the world. That`s the situation now. It`s intolerable.
Add as favourites (85) | Views: 1364
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6 AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com All right reserved |